Founder-investor used to be simple.

It was about burn rate, valuation, or the number of months left in the runway.

Now, there’s a new kind of friction quietly entering every conversation: ESG.

Founders see it as distraction.
Investors see it as risk management.
Both are right and that’s what makes it complicated.

Because ESG isn’t a moral framework anymore. It’s a control system, one that’s changing how early-stage capital, growth, and governance interact.

‍

‍How did ESG reporting begin for VCs?

For years, venture capital lived in a single equation:

Build fast, scale faster, exit before the system catches up.

ESG slipped into the picture through LP mandates and regulatory frameworks, not through founders’ pitch decks.

European LPs began asking fund managers to disclose environmental and social exposure under SFDR.

In parallel, public markets started rewarding companies that could demonstrate resilience to environmental or regulatory shocks.

Suddenly, GPs had to start tracking things founders didn’t; carbon exposure, diversity data, supply chain risks.

The pressure didn’t come from ideology. It came from fiduciary duty.

And that’s where the gap opened up.

The founder says: “We’re building the product.”
The investor says: “We’re protecting the fund.”

ESG sits right in the middle as a shared blind spot neither side fully owns.

‍

Why does ESG reporting matter in 2025?

The economic context has changed.

Capital is more expensive. Energy is more volatile. Regulation is accelerating.

The result?‍

ESG isn’t a nice-to-have anymore. It’s a proxy for long-term survival.

For investors, it’s about exposure: how environmental, social, and governance factors could impact their portfolio’s valuation.

For founders, it’s about autonomy: how much control they can retain over their narrative before compliance and disclosure frameworks start shaping it for them.

The irony is that both sides want the same thing, resilience, but they’re defining it through different time horizons and incentives.

‍

The three sources of ESG friction

1. Time horizon mismatch

Founders optimize for survival over the next 18 months.

Investors report to LPs who think in decades.

When a VC asks a founder about emissions, supply chain exposure, or governance structure, it’s not because they expect immediate perfection.

It’s because they’re managing future reputational and valuation risk.

But in the founder’s mind, it sounds like bureaucracy invading velocity.

The tension isn’t philosophical. It’s temporal.

2. The definition of “material”

Founders care about product–market fit.

Investors track portfolio resilience to see which markets, models, or behaviors could break first.

An early-stage climate fintech doesn’t think of “diversity metrics” as material.
But an institutional LP, bound by reporting requirements, does.

Both are right, but they’re solving for different systems of accountability.
And in that gap between relevance and requirement, ESG becomes friction instead of foresight.

3. The language of risk

Founders speak in sprints: short-term goals, OKRs, and milestones.
Investors speak in scenarios: systemic risk, resilience, long-term multiples.

When ESG enters the room, those two languages collide.

A founder says, “We’ll fix it when we scale.”
A GP replies, “We can’t fund you if you don’t start now.”

The solution isn’t more ESG data. It’s translation, a shared understanding of how risk today compounds into valuation tomorrow.

‍

The turning point: when ESG hits the Cap Table

The moment ESG stops being theoretical is when it affects capital access.

A VC fund raising from an Article 8, 8+or 9 LP now needs to demonstrate portfolio-level ESG integration.

That means early-stage founders are being asked for disclosures and governance standards that didn’t exist five years ago.

Some push back: “We’re too early for this.”
But that’s like saying, “We’re too early to manage risk.”

The truth is, ESG isn’t about being big enough to report, it’s about being smart enough to anticipate.

The startups that can articulate their ESG exposure early, even roughly, are now signaling maturity and risk awareness. That translates directly into investor confidence.

‍Case in point, a weather-exposed AI startup

Last summer, an AI infrastructure company faced a €4.2M loss when European heatwaves overloaded the power grid and shut down data centers for 72 hours.

What looked like an operational failure was actually an ESG failure. No climate stress testing, no redundancy planning, no governance oversight.

To its investors, this wasn’t about sustainability. It was about capital preservation.

And it marked a shift: ESG wasn’t just an impact metric. It was a valuation event.

‍

For VCs, ESG is due diligence 2.0

For early-stage investors, ESG is quickly becoming a proxy for portfolio durability.

A single flood, regulatory shift, or public backlash can wipe out a startup’s path to Series B faster than a market correction.

The next generation of fund managers isn’t adding ESG to appease LPs, they’re using it to identify resilient founders.

The ones who can model risk, anticipate volatility, and adapt their strategy are the ones who’ll outperform.

Because climate resilience, social trust, and governance maturity aren’t checkboxes.

They’re indicators of management quality.

‍

How to turn ESG tension into alignment?

The founder–investor ESG gap can be closed. It just requires reframing.

• Translate ESG into exposure. Don’t ask for sustainability metrics, ask what could kill your product.
• Map time horizons. Align the 18-month roadmap with the 5-year LP reporting cycle.
• Make it operational. Tie ESG to burn rate, cost base, and hiring, not just reporting.
• Use ESG as signal. A founder who can navigate systemic risk is one who can navigate scale.

ESG isn’t there to slow you down. It’s there to show you what could stop you altogether.

The Planicorn Takeaway

ESG has become the new source of founder–investor tension, but it doesn’t have to stay that way.

The best investors don’t demand ESG compliance; they build ESG fluency.
The best founders don’t resist disclosure; they use it to strengthen their story.

Somewhere between compliance and resilience lies the next generation of venture capital, one where ESG isn’t a checkbox, but a competitive edge.

‍

At Planicorn

We help venture funds and their portfolio companies bridge ESG friction by translating compliance into foresight, and reporting into risk intelligence. Because growth is what builds companies. Resilience is what keeps them alive.